RSB principle on Socio-economic development

From BioenergyWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Bioenergy > Sustainability standards > Initiatives > Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels > RSB Principles and Criteria (Version 0) > RSB principle on Socio-economic development


The Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels
Note: This RSB-related page is not actively updated.
For up-to-date information on the RSB, see the BioenergyWiki RSB page or the RSB Website

The RSB has released "Version 2.0" of the "Principles on Sustainable Biofuel Production"
Read more about the Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels.

http://www.bioenergywiki.net/index.php?title=Template:RSBArchive&action=editright


RSB principles
and criteria (Version 0)
edit

Quick links to each principle
and its associated discussion page:
  1. Legality (Discussion)
  2. Consultation (Discussion)
  3. Climate change (Discussion)
  4. Human & labor rights (Discussion)
  5. Rural & social development (Discussion)
  6. Food security (Discussion)
  7. Conservation (Discussion)
  8. Soil (Discussion)
  9. Water (Discussion)
  10. Air (Discussion)
  11. Technologies, etc. (Discussion )
  12. Land rights (Discussion)

(To comment on this principle, and its associated criteria and guidance, please use the Discussion Page.)


PRINCIPLE
5. Biofuel production shall contribute to the social and economic development of local, rural and indigenous peoples and communities.


CRITERIA

  • 5.a The ESIA carried out under 2a and monitoring required under 2b shall result in a baseline social assessment of existing social and economic conditions and a business plan that shall ensure sustainability, local economic development, equity for partners, and social and rural upliftment through all aspects of the value chain.

Key guidance: Small producers will need support or reduced requirements for this criterion. Large producers and processors shall work with local governmental and non-governmental agencies to ensure the proper application of this criterion. There should be measured improvements in the social and economic indicators as set against the baseline and targets, in proportion to the scale and extent of the project and the region in which it is located. The ILO’s Decent Work Agenda is a recommended tool for assessing local impacts. The following best practices should be aimed for in the projects: Local ownership, local employment and livelihood opportunities, opportunities for the labour force in the off-season to ensure stable local communities, diversification of crops if shown to improve local economic conditions of communities, training, value added products, credit facilities for local communities and small outgrowers (e.g. through micro credit schemes supported by buyers and/or financial institutions), and/or provision of biofuel or bioenergy to local communities to promote energy security. Appropriate institutional structures should be developed, such as co-operatives that encourage and maximize local involvement and management.

  • 5.b Special measures that benefit women, youth, indigenous communities and the vulnerable in the affected and interested communities shall be designed and implemented, where applicable.

Key guidance: Large producers and processors shall work with local governmental and non-governmental agencies to ensure the proper application of this criterion in proportion to the scale of the project.

Personal tools